Delhi Capitals (DC)‘ newly appointed head coach, Hemang Badani, has supplied detailed insights into the circumstances surrounding Rishabh Pant’s departure from the franchise.
Most costly participant in IPL 2025: Rishabh Pant
Pant, one of many Indian Premier League’s (IPL) brightest stars, was picked up by Lucknow Tremendous Giants (LSG) for a record-breaking sum of INR 27 crore through the IPL mega public sale in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The transfer marked a big second in IPL historical past, as Pant turned the costliest participant ever within the league. Regardless of Delhi exercising their right-to-match (RTM) choice, the franchise in the end determined to not proceed bidding for his or her former captain, citing causes tied to Pant’s ambitions and the public sale dynamics.
New head coach Hemang Badani breaks silence
Throughout an interview on Subramaniam Badrinath’s YouTube channel, Badani elaborated on why Capitals didn’t retain their star wicketkeeper-batter. In line with Badani, Pant was determined in his want to check his market worth within the public sale, a call that took priority over the franchise’s retention efforts. ” I feel it’s the opposite manner round. He wished to not be retained. He mentioned he wished to to the public sale and check the market,” Badani defined.
The coach revealed that intensive communication happened between Pant and the Delhi Capitals administration in an try and retain him. “If you wish to retain a participant, each events (the workforce and the participant) need to agree on sure issues. We tried speaking to him, the administration tried speaking to him. There have been plenty of telephone calls and messages exchanged,” he added. Regardless of these efforts, Pant remained agency in his determination, believing he may command a better worth than the INR 18 crore cap positioned on retained gamers.
Additionally READ: 3 gamers who can captain Delhi Capitals (DC) within the IPL 2025
A calculated transfer that paid off
Badani additionally advised that Pant’s determination was not impulsive however a well-thought-out technique based mostly on his self-assessment and the dynamics of the public sale. Pant’s confidence in his market worth was validated through the public sale when LSG raised their bid to INR 27 crore, setting a brand new benchmark for IPL contracts. Badani acknowledged Pant’s reasoning and congratulated him on his historic signing.
“He mentioned he wished to go to the public sale and check the mark. He mentioned he had a sense that there have been possibilities he would get more cash than the best cap for retained participant, which is ₹18 crore. And, on the finish of the day, he felt he was value extra. And the market mentioned the identical factor. He obtained ₹27 crore. Good for him. He’s an excellent participant. We’ll clearly miss him. However, life goes on,” Badani concluded.
A heartfelt farewell from Delhi Capitals
Following the public sale, Parth Jindal, co-owner of Delhi Capitals, expressed his feelings over Pant’s departure in a heartfelt word shared on X. Jindal thanked Pant for his invaluable contributions to the workforce, each as a participant and a captain, and expressed optimism a few potential reunion sooner or later.
To Rishabh @RishabhPant17 you might be and can all the time stay my youthful brother – from the underside of my coronary heart I really like you and I’ve tried all the things to be sure you are completely satisfied and have handled you want my household. I’m very unhappy to see you go and I’m very emotional about it. You’ll…
— Parth Jindal (@ParthJindal11) November 26, 2024
Pant’s record-breaking deal naturally fueled hypothesis concerning the position of funds in his departure from Capitals. Nonetheless, Pant himself took to social media to refute these claims. In response to a video the place Sunil Gavaskar advised that monetary disagreements may need been an element, Pant wrote on X (previously Twitter), “My retention wasn’t concerning the cash for positive that I can say.” This assertion was an try and clear the air and shift the narrative away from financial motives.
